Abortion and the End of Roe v. Wade – Part I

Abortion and the End of Roe v. Wade

In 1973 the Supreme Court first recognized a Constitutional right to abortion in the ceaselessly controversial case of Roe v. Wade (hereinafter “Roe”). The Court’s decision reasoned a constitutional right to abortion emanated from the right to privacy, as derived from the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. In its ruling, the Supreme Court recognized the issue of abortion requires balancing two sacred rights: the right to liberty and the right to life.

Individuals on both sides of the abortion debate have serious and legitimate concerns: those erring on the side of abortion as a Constitutional Right seek to protect women’s liberty and autonomy over their bodies (often termed “Pro-Choice Advocates”); alternatively, those seeking greater restrictions on abortions—and even total bans—are fighting to protect individual unborn children’s right to life (often termed “Pro-Life Advocates”).

The Supreme Court understood neither the right to life nor the right to liberty should be sacrificed: rather, the Court’s ruling in Roe created a zone of privacy wherein States were not permitted to regulate abortions pre-viability. The Court erected its zone of privacy scheme using the well-known three trimester phases of pregnancy: states were not permitted to regulate abortion in the first trimester (approximately 3 months), leaving the decision to undergo an abortion entirely to the pregnant woman and her physician; in the second trimester states could implement regulations reasonably related to maternal health; and in the third trimester—once the fetus reached “viability”—states could regulate or entirely ban abortions so long as they included exceptions for when abortion was necessary to save the life or health of the mother.

States have implemented various regulations congruent with the zone of privacy scheme in the decades since Roe was decided, with some States providing greater protections for liberty and others providing greater protections for life. In 2022 the Supreme Court shocked the Nation—and attorneys everywhere—when it overturned the nearly 50 year old precedent in Roe v. Wade—and the delicate schemas established thereunder—in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (hereinafter “Dobbs”).

The Dobbs decision held the United States’ Constitution does not confer a right to abortion, thereby returning the issue of abortion back to the individual States to promulgate their own laws, rights, and regulations. In later posts we will review the Dobbs decision in-depth; review and summarize the current state of North Carolina Abortion Law and national law trends; and examine what potential courses could play out moving forward post-Dobbs. To learn more about this case and its relevance, contact an Apple Payne legal professional today. Click here to read Part II of this series.



Author Bio

Ronald D. Payne II
Ronald D. Payne II is the CEO and Managing Attorney of Apple Payne Law, a North Carolina law firm he founded in 2018. With more than 11 years of experience practicing law, he is dedicated to representing clients in a wide range of legal matters, including business law, estate planning, family law, probate, and traffic law.

Ronald received his Juris Doctor from the Wake Forest University School of Law and is a member of the North Carolina Bar Association. He has received numerous accolades for his work, including being awarded the 2020 Client’s Choice Award by Avvo and multiple Rising Star awards from Super Lawyers.

LinkedIn | State Bar Association | Avvo | Google

location map

Contact us below and we’ll be in touch as soon as possible!

Kernersville Office

900 Old Winston Rd. STE 212
Kernersville NC 27284

Winston-Salem Office

190 Charlois Blvd. Suite 200
Winston-Salem NC 27103